Blogs/AI

Transformers vs vLLM vs SGLang: Comparison Guide

Written by Dharshan
Apr 20, 2026
7 Min Read
Transformers vs vLLM vs SGLang: Comparison Guide Hero

Transformers, vLLM, and SGLang are three of the most popular tools for running AI language models today, but they solve very different problems in practice. I’ve worked with all three while experimenting with local inference and serving setups, and the differences around setup effort, speed, memory use, and flexibility only become obvious once you try them yourself.

In this guide, I break down what each tool does, how to get started with them, and when one makes more sense than the others. Even if you're new to AI, this Transformers vs vLLM vs SGLang comparison should help you choose the right option, whether you're building an app, optimizing inference speed, or setting up smarter workflows.

Let’s dive in.

What are Transformers?

Transformers is an open-source library developed by Hugging Face that makes it easy to use powerful AI models for tasks like text generation, translation, question answering, and even working with images and audio. It provides access to thousands of pre-trained models that you can use with just a few lines of code. 

Whether you're a beginner or an experienced developer, Transformers helps you build and test AI applications quickly without needing deep knowledge of how the models work under the hood.

How to Set Up and Use Transformers?

Step 1: To get started with Transformers, you only need Python and a few commands. This setup is usually where I recommend starting if you want to test a model locally without worrying about performance tuning yet.

pip install transformers accelerate

Step 2: Once installed, you can load and run a TinyLlama model like this:

import torch
from transformers import pipeline

pipe = pipeline("text-generation", model="TinyLlama/TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0", torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16, device_map="auto")

messages = [
    {
        "role": "system",
        "content": "You are a friendly chatbot who always responds in the style of a pirate",
    },
    {"role": "user", "content": "what is llm?"},
]
prompt = pipe.tokenizer.apply_chat_template(messages, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True)
outputs = pipe(prompt)
print(outputs[0]["generated_text"].replace(prompt, "").strip())

This runs the TinyLlama model locally and prints the generated response. I’ve found it works reliably on most modern machines, and having a GPU makes a noticeable difference even for smaller models.

Serving with Transformers

Besides running models inside scripts, Transformers also lets you serve models as an API using the built-in CLI. I’ve used this approach when I needed a quick local endpoint for testing prompts from a web app or another service.

You can serve a model like TinyLlama using the following command:

transformers serve --model TinyLlama/TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0

Once the server is running, it exposes a local API (by default at http://localhost:8000) that follows the OpenAI chat API format. This means you can send chat-style messages to it using simple HTTP requests. Here’s how to do it in Python:

import requests

# API endpoint
url = "http://localhost:8000/v1/chat/completions"

# Input message in OpenAI format
payload = {
    "model": "TinyLlama/TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0",
    "messages": [
        {"role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?"}
    ]
}

# Send request
response = requests.post(url, json=payload)

# Print the response
print(response.json()["choices"][0]["message"]["content"])

What is vLLM?

vLLM is a high-performance engine designed specifically for serving large language models quickly and efficiently. I started using vLLM when response times with standard setups became a bottleneck, especially for chat-style or multi-user workloads. vLLM supports popular models like LLaMA, Mistral, and TinyLlama, and even works with vision-language models. It’s a great choice when you need fast and scalable model serving.

How to Set Up and Use vLLM?

Step 1: To get started with vLLM, first install it using pip:

pip install vllm

Step 2: Once installed, you can load and run a TinyLlama mode on vllm like this:

from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams

# Load model
llm = LLM(model="TinyLlama/TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0")

# Input prompt (chat-style)
user_input = "What is LLM?"
prompt = f"<|user|>\n{user_input}<|end|>\n<|assistant|>\n"

# Generate
outputs = llm.generate(prompt)
reply = outputs[0].outputs[0].text.strip()

# Print output
print(reply)

This code uses vLLM directly in Python to run the TinyLlama model efficiently. In my experience, this is one of the simplest ways to see vLLM’s performance benefits without setting up an API server first.

Transformer, vLLM, and SGLang Comparison Workshop
Explore how different inference engines handle batching, memory, and token throughput. Includes benchmarks and code walkthrough.
Murtuza Kutub
Murtuza Kutub
Co-Founder, F22 Labs

Walk away with actionable insights on AI adoption.

Limited seats available!

Calendar
Saturday, 30 May 2026
10PM IST (60 mins)

Serving with vLLM

vLLM isn’t limited to scripts, it also lets you serve models as a high-performance API using the OpenAI chat format. This is the setup I usually switch to once I need consistent latency across multiple requests. This is helpful when building apps that need to send prompts to the model over HTTP.

You can serve a model like TinyLlama using this command:

vllm serve TinyLlama/TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0 --dtype auto --api-key token-abc123

The server will be available at http://localhost:8000/v1 by default.


Use the OpenAI SDK with vLLM

vLLM supports the OpenAI API format, so you can use the official OpenAI Python client like this:

from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
    base_url="http://localhost:8000/v1",  # Make sure it's http, not https
    api_key="token-abc123",               # Same key as used in vllm serve
)
completion = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="TinyLlama/TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
)
print(completion.choices[0].message)

What is SGLang?

SGLang is a tool that helps you build smart chat systems using AI models. It lets you write simple Python code to control how the model responds, making it easier to create custom assistants or workflows. SGLang runs on top of vLLM, so it’s fast and efficient. It’s a great choice when you want more control over how your AI behaves.

How to Set Up and Use SGLang?

Step 1: To get started with SGLang, install it along with vLLM using pip:

pip install "sglang[all]>=0.4.9.post3"

Step 2: Once installed, you can load and run a TinyLlama mode on SGLang like this:

from sglang.test.test_utils import is_in_ci
from sglang.utils import wait_for_server, print_highlight, terminate_process

if is_in_ci():
    from patch import launch_server_cmd
else:
    from sglang.utils import launch_server_cmd

# This is equivalent to running the following command in your terminal

# python3 -m sglang.launch_server --model-path qwen/qwen2.5-0.5b-instruct --host 0.0.0.0

server_process, port = launch_server_cmd(
    """
python3 -m sglang.launch_server --model-path qwen/qwen2.5-0.5b-instruct \
 --host 0.0.0.0
"""
)
wait_for_server(f"http://localhost:{port}")

This code runs the TinyLlama model using SGLang, allowing you to define chat behavior with simple Python code with no extra setup required.

Serving with SGLang

SGLang lets you serve language models with extra flexibility, allowing you to define how the model responds through simple Python functions. It also supports OpenAI-style API calls, making integration with apps and tools straightforward.

To serve a model like TinyLlama, run:

python3 -m sglang.launch_server --model-path TinyLlama/TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0 --host 0.0.0.0 --port 3000

Once running, the server is ready to receive chat requests and can be customized for advanced features like tool use, memory, and function calling.

Use the OpenAI SDK with vLLM

vLLM supports the OpenAI API format, so you can use the official OpenAI Python client like this:

import openai

client = openai.Client(base_url=f"https://9654207c14a2.ngrok-free.app/v1", api_key="None")

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="TinyLlama/TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0",
    messages=[
        {"role": "user", "content": "What is LLM?."},
    ],
    temperature=0,
    max_tokens=64,
)
print(response.choices[0].message.content)

Performance Comparison Between Transformers vs vLLM vs SGLang

To understand how Transformers, vLLM, and SGLang behave in practice, I ran a simple test using the same prompt across all three setups: “What is LLM?”

Transformer, vLLM, and SGLang Comparison Workshop
Explore how different inference engines handle batching, memory, and token throughput. Includes benchmarks and code walkthrough.
Murtuza Kutub
Murtuza Kutub
Co-Founder, F22 Labs

Walk away with actionable insights on AI adoption.

Limited seats available!

Calendar
Saturday, 30 May 2026
10PM IST (60 mins)

This test was done using the TinyLlama model on a system with 15 GB of available GPU memory, which reflects a fairly common local development setup. We measured two things:

  • How much GPU memory (VRAM) each tool used
  • How fast they responded (latency)

Here’s a breakdown of the results:

ToolGPU Usage (out of 15 GB)Response TimeNotes

Transformers

2.2 GB

4.4 seconds

Light on memory, but slow

vLLM

13.3 GB

1.55 seconds

Very fast, but heavy on VRAM

SGLang

12.6 GB

1.08 seconds

Fastest and slightly lighter

Transformers

GPU Usage (out of 15 GB)

2.2 GB

Response Time

4.4 seconds

Notes

Light on memory, but slow

1 of 3

Feature Comparison of Transformers vs vLLM vs SGLang

FeaturesTransformersvLLMSGLang

Core Use Case

Simple, low-latency text generation

Fast single-round inference for many users

Rich multi-turn conversations and complex task routing

Efficiency Design

Lightweight, traditional architecture

Memory-optimized via advanced scheduling and KV reuse

Task-optimized execution using compiler-style planning

Memory Strategy

Minimal memory use, less VRAM required

PagedAttention allows dynamic reuse of KV memory

Efficient per-task memory allocation with internal optimization

Scalability

Limited parallelism, not ideal for high loads

Scales well with many concurrent users

Scales well for dialog-heavy systems

Flexibility

Works out of the box with standard APIs

Focused on performance over flexibility

Highly configurable for complex pipeline behaviors

Latency Control

Higher latency under load

Low latency due to dynamic batching

Ultra-low latency for conversational models

Customization Support

Basic hooks or extensions possible

Ready-to-use, minimal tweaking needed

Deep customization with domain-specific logic

Core Use Case

Transformers

Simple, low-latency text generation

vLLM

Fast single-round inference for many users

SGLang

Rich multi-turn conversations and complex task routing

1 of 7

What do these numbers tell us?

  • Based on these results, Transformers behaves like a compact car—it’s memory-efficient, but noticeably slower once you start measuring response times side by side.
  • vLLM is like a sports car. It goes fast, but it uses a lot of fuel (GPU).
  • SGLang is like a tuned-up version of that sports car just as fast, and even slightly more efficient in memory use.

In practical terms:

  • If you're just exploring or running on a machine with limited GPU, Transformers might be the safer choice.
  • If you need speed and are okay using more GPU, vLLM is a strong option.
  • If you want both speed and more control/customization, SGLang stands out with the fastest response time in this test.

This hands-on test makes it clear how each tool behaves under the same conditions, helping you choose based on what matters most to you: memory usage, speed, or control. In many production cases, teams also compare these setups with Small language models when they want lightweight performance on limited hardware without sacrificing too much capability.

Conclusion

Transformers, vLLM, and SGLang each fit different AI workloads. Transformers is best for simple local testing and low-memory setups. vLLM is ideal for high-speed production serving, while SGLang adds more control for advanced workflows and custom pipelines.

The best choice depends on your performance, memory, and customization needs. If your team is planning large-scale deployment or custom inference systems, working with an experienced AI development company can help you choose and implement the right stack faster.

Author-Dharshan
Dharshan

Passionate AI/ML Engineer with interest in OpenCV, MediaPipe, and LLMs. Exploring computer vision and NLP to build smart, interactive systems.

Share this article

Phone

Next for you

3,000 Tokens/Sec on Two RTX 4090s for Free Cover

AI

May 22, 20267 min read

3,000 Tokens/Sec on Two RTX 4090s for Free

We had 475,000 candidate profiles to synthesise for HuntVox, our internal tool. The data came from multiple sources, including LinkedIn, Weekday, resume parsing pipelines, and Lemlist, resulting in duplicate fields, inconsistent formats, and noisy profile information. Our goal was simple: convert raw profiles into semantic summaries, structured skills, and domain tags that could improve search quality and retrieval. At this scale, hosted APIs became difficult to justify. Rate limits reduced th

TRT-LLM vs vLLM vs SGLang: What to Choose in 2026 Cover

AI

May 15, 202611 min read

TRT-LLM vs vLLM vs SGLang: What to Choose in 2026

Running LLMs efficiently is one of the most important engineering challenges in today’s world. We need to choose the right inference engine. The wrong choice can mean slow responses, wasted GPU memory, and poor user experience. This blog documents what we learned after benchmarking three inference engines on a RTX 4090 server: NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM, vLLM, and SGLang. We explain not just the numbers, but why each engine behaves the way it does at the GPU level. What Are These Engines? Before co

Speculative Speculative Decoding Explained Cover

AI

May 25, 202612 min read

Speculative Speculative Decoding Explained

If you have worked with large language models in production, you have probably faced this problem: Models are powerful, but they are slow. Even with good GPUs, generating responses one token at a time adds latency. For real-world applications like chat systems, copilots, or voice assistants, this delay is noticeable and often unacceptable. Several techniques have been proposed to speed up inference. One of the most effective is speculative decoding, which uses a smaller model to guess the nex