Facebook iconDifference Between VAPI AI vs RETELL AI Voice AI Platforms
F22 logo
Blogs/AI

Difference Between VAPI AI vs RETELL AI Voice AI Platforms

Written by Kiruthika
Feb 12, 2026
4 Min Read
Difference Between VAPI AI vs RETELL AI Voice AI Platforms Hero

Selecting the right AI voice platform can feel like a high-stakes decision when customer experience, cost per call, and reliability all sit on the line. I wrote this comparison to make that choice clearer by breaking down where Vapi AI and Retell AI differ in practical ways, customization depth, telephony flexibility, compliance posture, and how each platform fits different operational realities. This analysis highlights the strengths and limitations of both, so you can map the platform to your use case instead of picking based on feature lists.

What is Vapi AI

Vapi AI is a developer-centric platform designed to empower businesses with customizable tools for building advanced voice AI agents. It caters to enterprises seeking deep customization and flexibility in their voice applications.

PROSCONS

Enhanced User Experience

Complex Pricing Structure

Advanced Language Processing

Limited Free Concurrency

Strong Developer Support

Restricted Telephony Integration

Robust Customization Options

Lower Uptime Guarantee

Enhanced User Experience

CONS

Complex Pricing Structure

1 of 4

What is Retell AI

Retell AI is a platform designed to enhance phone call interactions through advanced AI capabilities, providing features like live transcription and tool calling. It ensures compliance with industry standards by being HIPAA compliant, with SOC 2 Type II compliance in progress.

PROSCONS

User-Friendly Interface

Limited Customization for Developers

High reliability

Potential Latency Issues

Flexible Pricing Model

Limited Voice Cloning Capabilities

Comprehensive Feature Set

Limited number of agents that can be deployed

User-Friendly Interface

CONS

Limited Customization for Developers

1 of 4

Feature Comparison between Vapi AI and Retell AI

Now, we’ll explore the key differences between the basic features of Vapi AI and Retell AI, comparing their capabilities, performance, and suitability for various use cases.

FeatureVapi AIRetell AINotes

Agent Builder

Single Prompt & Agent Blocks

Single Prompt & Multi Prompt

Retell's multi-prompt system offers more flexibility in conversation design

Custom LLM Support

Yes - Multiple model support

Yes - Multiple model support

Both platforms allow integration with various LLM providers

Multilingual Support

35+ languages

19 languages

Vapi offers broader language coverage

Voice Quality

High-quality TTS

High-quality TTS 

Retell offers additional audio customization

Latency

Sub-second latency

Sub-second latency

Both platforms offer similar performance

Uptime SLA

99.94%

99.99%

Retell offers slightly better reliability

Concurrent Calls

10 free concurrent calls

20 free concurrent calls

Retell provides better free tier capacity

Response Time

Real-time

Real-time

Both platforms offer quick response times

Custom Telephony

Limited to Twilio and Vonage

Supports SIP trunking to any telephony

Retell offers more flexible telephony options

Webhook Support

Yes

Yes

Both support real-time event notifications

Post-call Analysis

Yes 

Yes

Both offer call analysis capabilities

Real-time Monitoring

Yes

Yes

Both provide live monitoring features

Call Recording

Available with transcription

Available with transcription

Both support call recording

Compliance Certifications

HIPAA, GDPR & SOC 2

(HIPAA: $1,000/month additional)

HIPAA, GDPR, SOC 2 Type 1 & Type 2

(All included)

Retell offers more comprehensive compliance coverage

Webcall Support

Yes 

Yes 

Both support web-based calling

Knowledge Base

Supported

Supported

Both offer knowledge base integration

Agent Builder

Vapi AI

Single Prompt & Agent Blocks

Retell AI

Single Prompt & Multi Prompt

Notes

Retell's multi-prompt system offers more flexibility in conversation design

1 of 16

Why Choose One Over the Other?

When deciding between Vapi AI and Retell AI, consider the following factors:

  • Customization Needs: If your business requires deep customization and has the technical expertise to manage complex configurations, Vapi AI's robust customization options and strong developer support may be advantageous.
  • User-Friendly Experience: For businesses seeking an intuitive interface with comprehensive features and high reliability, Retell AI offers a user-friendly platform with a wide range of functionalities and a higher uptime guarantee.
Suggested Reads- Difference Between VAPI AI vs VOCODE Platforms

Plans and Pricing of Vapi AI and Retell AI

PlanVapi AIRetell AI

Base Rate

$0.05 per minute fixed platform fee

$0.07–$0.31 per minute, depending on selected features

Additional Costs

Extra charges for long prompts; $2.00/month per phone number; Slack support: $5,000/month; HIPAA compliance: $1,000 month

Conversation voice engine API, LLM Agent, Telephony, Knowledge

Base Rate

Vapi AI

$0.05 per minute fixed platform fee

Retell AI

$0.07–$0.31 per minute, depending on selected features

1 of 2

Which AI is Best For You?

When choosing between Vapi AI and Retell AI, it's essential to align the platform's strengths with your business requirements:

  • Vapi AI is ideal for organizations seeking deep customization and possessing the technical expertise to manage complex configurations. Its robust developer support and extensive language processing capabilities make it suitable for enterprises with specific AI needs. 
Comparing Voice AI Platforms: Vapi vs Retell
Explore latency, voice quality, and API design differences between these voice-AI providers.
Murtuza Kutub
Murtuza Kutub
Co-Founder, F22 Labs

Walk away with actionable insights on AI adoption.

Limited seats available!

Calendar
Saturday, 28 Feb 2026
10PM IST (60 mins)

However, businesses should be mindful of its complex pricing structure and additional costs for compliance and support.

  • Retell AI offers a user-friendly interface with a comprehensive feature set, including live transcription, customizable call parameters, and tool calling. Its flexible pricing model and higher uptime guarantee make it a reliable choice for businesses aiming for quick deployment and high reliability. 

While it may have limited deep customization options, it provides sufficient flexibility for most business applications.

What Customers Think About Vapi AI and Retell AI

Customer feedback provides valuable insights into the real-world performance of these platforms:

Comparing Voice AI Platforms: Vapi vs Retell
Explore latency, voice quality, and API design differences between these voice-AI providers.
Murtuza Kutub
Murtuza Kutub
Co-Founder, F22 Labs

Walk away with actionable insights on AI adoption.

Limited seats available!

Calendar
Saturday, 28 Feb 2026
10PM IST (60 mins)

Vapi AI

  • "Amazing System that they are building. I had issues on a Saturday night, and received a phone call from one of the technicians Sahil and he helped me through my issue. What dedication. I saw some of the other reviews, and they seem to be related to billings, and stuff that could easily be spoken about. I just wanted to give a shout-out to this guy for his passion and dedication to the project." - Robert Peter 

Retell AI

  • Users appreciate Retell AI's efficiency and natural interactions. One reviewer stated, "We’ve been using Retell to build these voice agents for our customer service, for over a year. It’s so natural, people don’t even realize it’s not a human half the time."
  • Another user highlighted the platform's cost-effectiveness, noting, "Retell AI has no platform fees, meaning you only pay for what matters: the API cost."
Suggested reads- Difference Between VAPI AI vs RASA Voice AI Platforms

In conclusion, both Vapi AI and Retell AI can be strong choices for voice automation, but the right pick depends on what matters most in your deployment. If the priority is deep customization and developer-led control, Vapi AI is often the better fit, especially for teams building highly tailored workflows. If the priority is faster rollout, strong reliability, and a streamlined platform experience with broad built-in capabilities, Retell AI is typically the better match.

The best decision comes from aligning the platform to your call volume, telephony needs, compliance requirements, and the level of engineering ownership your team can sustain.

Author-Kiruthika
Kiruthika

I'm an AI/ML engineer passionate about developing cutting-edge solutions. I specialize in machine learning techniques to solve complex problems and drive innovation through data-driven insights.

Share this article

Phone

Next for you

DSPy vs Normal Prompting: A Practical Comparison Cover

AI

Feb 23, 202618 min read

DSPy vs Normal Prompting: A Practical Comparison

When you build an AI agent that books flights, calls tools, or handles multi-step workflows, one question comes up quickly: how should you control the model? Most developers use prompt engineering. You write detailed instructions, add examples, adjust wording, and test until it works. Sometimes it works well. Sometimes changing a single sentence breaks the entire workflow. DSPy offers a different approach. Instead of manually crafting prompts, you define what the system should do, and the fram

How to Calculate GPU Requirements for LLM Inference? Cover

AI

Feb 23, 20269 min read

How to Calculate GPU Requirements for LLM Inference?

If you’ve ever tried running a large language model on a CPU, you already know the pain. It works, but the latency feels unbearable. This usually leads to the obvious question:          “If my CPU can run the model, why do I even need a GPU?” The short answer is performance. The long answer is what this blog is about. Understanding GPU requirements for LLM inference is not about memorizing hardware specs. It’s about understanding where memory goes, what limits throughput, and how model choice

Map Reduce for Large Document Summarization with LLMs Cover

AI

Feb 23, 20268 min read

Map Reduce for Large Document Summarization with LLMs

LLMs are exceptionally good at understanding and generating text, but they struggle when documents grow large. Movies script, policy PDFs, books, and research papers quickly exceed a model’s context window, resulting in incomplete summaries, missing sections, or higher latency. When it’s tempting to assume that increasing context length solves this problem, real-world usage shows hits different. Larger contexts increase cost, latency, and instability, and still do not guarantee full coverage.