Are you tired of your AI assistant giving you outdated information or saying "I can't access that" when you need real-time data?
You've tried asking AI about your business data it doesn't know. You want it to check your emails or calendar it can't. You need it to look up information from your company systems which is impossible.
Here's the problem: Most AI tools are disconnected from everything else you use.
It's like having a really smart assistant who's locked in a separate room with no phone, no computer, and no way to access any of your files. They can answer general questions all day, but they can't help with the specific stuff that matters to you.
This is why you end up copying information back and forth, doing the work yourself, and wondering why AI isn't as helpful as everyone promised.
But there are ways to fix this. Two popular solutions are called "Model Context Protocol (MCP)" and "Function Calling." These are just fancy names for methods that let AI connect to your tools and data.
Function Calling enables LLMs to interact with external systems by invoking predefined functions based on user prompts. For example, if someone asks, "What's the weather in Chennai in Celsius?", the LLM generates a function call containing the necessary details (location and temperature unit) to retrieve the weather data.
This mechanism allows LLMs to execute tasks beyond their inherent training data, such as fetching real-time information or performing specific computations. Each LLM provider has their own way of defining these functions. There is no universal standard yet.
{
"index": 0,
"message": {
"role": "assistant",
"content": null,
"tool_calls": [
{
"name": "get_weather",
"arguments": "{\n \"location\": \"Chennai\",\n \"unit\": \"Celsius\"\n}"
}
]
},
"finish_reason": "tool_calls"
}
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": [
{
"type": "text",
"text": "<thinking>To answer this question, I will: …</thinking>"
},
{
"type": "tool_use",
"id": "abcj8765",
"name": "get_weather",
"input": {"location": "Chennai", "unit": "Celsius"}
}
]
}
{
"functionCall": {
"name": "get_weather",
"args": {
"location": "Chennai",
"unit": "Celsius"
}
}
}
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": null,
"function_call": {
"name": "get_weather",
"arguments": {
"location": "Chennai",
"unit": "Celsius"
}
}
}
Experience seamless collaboration and exceptional results.
Introduced by Anthropic, the Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an open standard designed to facilitate secure, two-way connections between LLMs and external data sources or tools. MCP aims to provide a unified framework for integrating diverse data sources, enabling LLMs to access and utilize external context seamlessly.
Example MCP Request
{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"id": 128,
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "get_weather",
"arguments": {
"location": "Chennai",
"unit": "Celsius"
}
}
}
Experience seamless collaboration and exceptional results.
Aspect | Function Calling | Model Context Protocol (MCP) |
Architecture | Direct invocation of predefined functions by the LLM. Converts user prompts into structured function calls. | Standardized protocol facilitating two-way communication between LLMs and external systems. |
Use Cases | Suitable for tasks requiring specific, well-defined operations. | Ideal for scenarios needing dynamic, context-rich interactions with multiple data sources. |
Scalability | May face challenges as the number of functions increases. | Designed to handle complex integrations at scale. |
Flexibility | Limited to predefined functions; less adaptable to unforeseen tasks. | Offers greater flexibility through dynamic context provision. |
Implementation | Relatively straightforward, but can become complex with numerous functions. | Requires adherence to MCP standards; initial setup may be more involved. |
Security | Controlled access to specific functions enhances security. | Emphasizes secure data transmission and standardized access protocols. |
Both Model Context Protocol (MCP) and Function calling represent significant strides in enhancing the capabilities of LLMs by integrating them with external tools and data sources.
Function Calling offers a straightforward approach for extending LLM functionalities through predefined functions, ensuring predictability and control.
In contrast, MCP provides a standardized and scalable framework for dynamic, context-aware interactions, positioning it as a robust solution for complex enterprise applications.
The choice between implementing Function Calling or adopting MCP hinges on the specific requirements of the application, including factors such as scalability, flexibility, and the complexity of interactions needed.
As the AI ecosystem continues to evolve, both approaches are likely to play pivotal roles in shaping the future of LLM integrations.