Facebook iconVoxtral-Mini 3B vs Whisper Large V3: Which One’s Faster? - F22 Labs
Blogs/AI

Voxtral-Mini 3B vs Whisper Large V3: Which One’s Faster?

Written by Dharshan
Sep 19, 2025
4 Min Read
Voxtral-Mini 3B vs Whisper Large V3: Which One’s Faster? Hero

Which speech-to-text model delivers faster and more accurate transcriptions Voxtral-Mini 3B or Whisper Large V3?

We put Voxtral-Mini 3B and Whisper Large V3 head-to-head to find out which speech-to-text model performs better in real-world tasks. Using the same audio clips, we compared latency (speed) and word error rate (accuracy) to help you choose the right model for use cases like transcribing calls, meetings, or voice messages.

As speech-to-text systems become smarter and more reliable, they’re transforming how we interact with technology from voice assistants to customer support tools. Many speech-to-text models now make it possible to handle calls, meetings, and recordings with higher efficiency. Read on to see how Voxtral and Whisper stack up and which one could power your next voice-enabled application.

What Is Voxtral-Mini 3B?

Voxtral-Mini 3B is a new AI model that listens to speech and turns it into clear written text. It was created by a company called Mistral and is designed to be fast, lightweight, and accurate. What makes it special is that it not only understands speech but can also follow instructions and generate better-quality responses. 

Even though it’s smaller in size compared to some big models, it performs surprisingly well. This makes it a strong option for apps that need quick and reliable speech-to-text conversion.

Usage Setup

Here’s how you can set up and use Voxtral-Mini 3B in a Python environment using vLLM.

Setting up Voxtral-Mini 3B is simple if you're using Python. The model is built to work well with vLLm, a fast and efficient backend for running large language models, especially with audio input.

Requirements

  • A GPU with at least 9.5 GB of memory (recommended: A100 or similar)
  • Python installed
  • vLLM installed with audio support

Installation Steps

Use the following command to install vLLM along with audio support:

uv pip install -U "vllm[audio]" --torch-backend=auto --extra-index-url https://wheels.vllm.ai/nightly

Running Voxtral-Mini as a Server

Once installed, you can start serving the model using:

vllm serve mistralai/Voxtral-Mini-3B-2507 --tokenizer_mode mistral --config_format mistral --load_format mistral

This sets up the model so you can send audio to it and get transcriptions or even summaries and answers.

Innovations in AI
Exploring the future of artificial intelligence
Murtuza Kutub
Murtuza Kutub
Co-Founder, F22 Labs

Walk away with actionable insights on AI adoption.

Limited seats available!

Calendar
Saturday, 18 Oct 2025
10PM IST (60 mins)

Usage Code

import gradio as gr
import time
from jiwer import wer
from mistral_common.audio import Audio
from mistral_common.protocol.instruct.messages import RawAudio
from mistral_common.protocol.transcription.request import TranscriptionRequest
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    api_key="EMPTY",
    base_url="http://localhost:8000/v1"
)

def transcribe_with_latency_and_wer(audio_file, reference_text):
    start_time = time.time()

    # Load audio file (must be supported format like wav/flac/ogg)
    audio = Audio.from_file(audio_file, strict=False)
    raw_audio = RawAudio.from_audio(audio)

    # Transcribe
    model_id = client.models.list().data[0].id
    request = TranscriptionRequest(
        model=model_id,
        audio=raw_audio,
        language="en",
        temperature=0.0
    ).to_openai(exclude=("top_p", "seed"))

    response = client.audio.transcriptions.create(**request)

    end_time = time.time()
    latency = end_time - start_time
    hypothesis = response.text.strip()

    # Compute WER
    reference = reference_text.strip()
    error = wer(reference, hypothesis) if reference else "N/A"
    return f"""📝 Transcription:\n{hypothesis}
📜 Reference:\n{reference}
📊 Word Error Rate (WER): {error if error == "N/A" else f"{error*100:.2f}%"}
⏱️ Latency: {latency:.2f} seconds
"""
# Gradio interface with reference text input
gr.Interface(
    fn=transcribe_with_latency_and_wer,
    inputs=[
        gr.Audio(type="filepath", label="Upload Audio File (.wav, .flac)"),
        gr.Textbox(label="Reference Text (Ground Truth)", placeholder="Enter the expected text here...")
    ],
    outputs="text",
    title="🎙️ Voxtral-Mini Transcription + WER",
    description="Upload an audio file and (optionally) its ground truth to measure transcription quality using WER."
).launch()

What Is Whisper Large V3?

Whisper Large V3 is a speech-to-text model developed by OpenAI. It can understand many languages and accurately convert spoken words into written text, even in noisy environments. It's widely used for subtitles, voice notes, and meeting transcriptions.

Model Comparison: Voxtral-Mini 3B vs Whisper Large V3

To see which model performs better, I tested both on the same audio clips and compared them based on two key things:

  • Latency: How fast the model gives back the text
  • WER (Word Error Rate): How many mistakes it makes while transcribing
Model Comparison: Voxtral-Mini 3B vs Whisper Large V3

https://mistral.ai/news/voxtral

Speech Transcription:

Voxtral Speech Transcription

https://mistral.ai/news/voxtral

Innovations in AI
Exploring the future of artificial intelligence
Murtuza Kutub
Murtuza Kutub
Co-Founder, F22 Labs

Walk away with actionable insights on AI adoption.

Limited seats available!

Calendar
Saturday, 18 Oct 2025
10PM IST (60 mins)

Result Table

FeatureWhisper Large V3Voxtral-Mini 3B

1-minute audio latency

8.17 seconds

3.01 seconds

WER (Word Error Rate)

31.35%

17.84%

GPU Memory Used

~5.1 GB

~21.2 GB

Language Support

50+ languages

8 major languages

Extra Features

Basic transcription

Transcription + summarization + Q&A from voice

1-minute audio latency

Whisper Large V3

8.17 seconds

Voxtral-Mini 3B

3.01 seconds

1 of 5
Voxtral Mini Transcription + WER
Whisper Large V3 Voxtral Transcription
Suggested Reads- A Complete Guide to Using Whisper ASR: From Installation to Implementation

Conclusion:

In this comparison, Voxtral-Mini 3B stood out for its speed and accuracy, delivering faster transcriptions with fewer errors. Its advanced features, like summarizing audio and answering questions directly from voice input, make it even more versatile for real-world applications. 

Whisper Large V3, however, remains a solid contender, especially if you need robust multilingual support or work with audio in noisy environments. Choosing between them depends on your priorities. 

If you want quick, high-quality transcriptions and smart voice features, Voxtral-Mini is the clear winner. But for broader language coverage, Whisper still holds its ground.

Both are powerful tools, now it’s up to you to decide which fits your needs best.

Author-Dharshan
Dharshan

Passionate AI/ML Engineer with interest in OpenCV, MediaPipe, and LLMs. Exploring computer vision and NLP to build smart, interactive systems.

Share this article

Phone

Next for you

Codeium vs Copilot: A Comparative Guide in 2025 Cover

AI

Sep 30, 20259 min read

Codeium vs Copilot: A Comparative Guide in 2025

Are you still debating which AI coding assistant deserves a spot in your developer toolbox this year? Both Codeium and GitHub Copilot promise to supercharge productivity, but they approach coding differently.  GitHub made it known that developers using Copilot complete tasks up to 55% faster compared to coding alone. That’s impressive, but speed isn’t the only factor. Your choice depends on whether you are a solo developer building an MVP or part of a large enterprise team managing massive repo

Zed vs Cursor AI: The Ultimate 2025 Comparison Guide Cover

AI

Oct 14, 20257 min read

Zed vs Cursor AI: The Ultimate 2025 Comparison Guide

Coding has changed. A few years ago, AI lived in plugins and extensions. Today, editors like Zed and Cursor AI are built with AI at the core, reshaping how developers write, debug, and collaborate. But the real question in 2025 isn’t whether to use AI, it’s which editor makes the most sense for your workflow. According to Stack Overflow’s 2023 Developer Survey, 70% of developers are already using or planning to use AI tools in their workflow. With adoption accelerating, the choice of editor is

AWS CodeWhisperer vs Copilot: A Comparative Guide in 2025 Cover

AI

Sep 30, 20259 min read

AWS CodeWhisperer vs Copilot: A Comparative Guide in 2025

Tight deadlines. Security requirements. The pressure to deliver more with fewer resources. These are challenges every developer faces in 2025. Hence, the reason AI coding assistants are in such high demand.  Now, the question is, should your team rely on AWS CodeWhisperer or GitHub Copilot? This is more than a curiosity question. AI assistants are no longer simple autocomplete tools; they now understand project context, generate complete functions, and even flag security risks before code is de