When building scalable web platforms, whether it’s a crypto trading exchange, a real-time chess application, or a standard e-commerce store, one of the foundational architectural choices you must make is whether to design your backend as stateful or stateless. This decision has significant implications for scalability, performance, reliability, and user experience.
Let’s explore the fundamental differences between these two approaches, examine practical use cases, and understand how technologies like Redis can help manage state effectively.
In a stateful backend, the server retains information about the user across multiple requests. This design is ideal for situations where user interactions are part of a continuous or dependent process. The system remembers details such as the user's session, previous actions, and current progress.
A typical example is a real-time chess application. During an ongoing match, the backend needs to keep track of:
In stateful systems, this information is often stored in server memory or a session store so that it can be quickly accessed and updated. This enables fast, real-time interactions and continuity for the user.
Other examples of stateful systems include:
For example, in a chess game, it would be inefficient to store every move in a database and reload the game state on each request. Instead, storing the game state in memory provides a much faster and smoother experience.
The same principle applies to live crypto dashboards that must reflect real-time price movements, user balances, and open positions. These data points change rapidly and must be maintained in memory for optimal performance.
Suggested Reads- What is Kubernetes (K8s): A Comprehensive Guide
A stateless backend treats every client request as an independent transaction. The server does not remember any previous interaction with the client. This means that each incoming request must contain all the necessary data required to complete the request.
This model simplifies horizontal scaling because any server in the cluster can handle any request. There is no dependency on previous user activity or the need to persist session information, making stateless systems relatively simple to load balance and scale.
Common examples of stateless systems include:
Stateless backends are particularly useful in high-performance scenarios, such as cryptocurrency trading platforms, where APIS for placing trades or retrieving historical data can function independently. Each of these operations is self-contained and does not rely on previous user interactions.
However, even in crypto platforms, there are parts of the system that require stateful design. For example, when users are actively monitoring live charts, viewing open orders, or receiving WebSocket updates, it becomes necessary to manage temporary state in memory.
Writing this information to the database in real-time would be inefficient and could lead to performance bottlenecks. In such cases, in-memory state management becomes crucial.
Experience seamless collaboration and exceptional results.
The primary challenge of a stateful architecture lies in scalability. Since the server holds the user session in memory, each client must interact with the same server throughout the session. If that server fails or restarts, the session data is lost unless the system has a mechanism to persist or replicate the session state.
In a server cluster, this creates a problem. For example, if a user is connected to one server and that server goes down, rerouting the user to a different server will not work unless the session data is available to all servers.
There are two common solutions to this issue:
Sticky sessions reduce flexibility and fault tolerance. If the server goes down, the session is lost. Redis, however, provides fast access to session data with high availability and redundancy, which makes it a much more scalable and resilient option for managing state across a distributed system.
Let us compare both approaches across a few key dimensions:
Redis is an in-memory data store that plays a crucial role in modern application architectures by supporting both stateless and stateful use cases. It can store data that needs to be accessed quickly, making it ideal for session management, caching, or pub-sub communication.
Redis supports features such as:
While Redis is primarily an in-memory store, it offers durability through these features. This makes it a popular choice for storing real-time application state without sacrificing speed or reliability.
Most real-world platforms do not strictly follow either stateless or stateful paradigms. Instead, they use a hybrid approach depending on the feature.
Stateless means the server does not remember anything about the client between requests. Each request is independent and must contain all the necessary information.
Stateful means the server keeps track of the user's session, progress, or actions between requests.
Redis plays a key supporting role in both stateless and stateful workflows:
Experience seamless collaboration and exceptional results.
Redis is commonly used in such platforms to cache product information for faster access and to manage cart sessions efficiently.
Choosing between stateless and stateful design depends on your application's requirements. Here’s a practical guide:
Feature | Stateless | Stateful |
Scalability | High, easy to scale horizontally | Medium, session data must be managed |
Session Persistence | None, each request is independent | Session-aware, remembers user data |
Examples | REST APIs, JWT auth, product search | Shopping carts, live chats, and collaborative docs |
Memory Usage | Low, no session data on server | Higher – stores session data in memory/store |
Failure Recovery | Easier, requests are stateless | Harder – need to sync/replicate session state |
Use with Redis | For caching only | For caching + session storage |
Best For | Public APIs, fast data retrieval | Real-time tools, multi-step processes |
Area | Stateless | Stateful |
Pros | ✅ Highly scalable – no need to manage sessions | ✅ Retains context across multiple requests (e.g., checkout, chat) |
✅ Easier to cache and load balance | ✅ Better suited for real-time, interactive experiences |
|
✅ Simpler to deploy across distributed systems | ✅ Can handle multi-step workflows more smoothly |
|
✅ Lower memory usage on the server | ||
✅ Easier to recover from failure (no session syncing needed) | ||
Cons | ❌ No built-in session tracking – every request must contain full context | ❌ Harder to scale horizontally – needs session sharing or sticky sessions |
❌ Difficult to implement multi-step workflows (e.g., onboarding, checkout) | ❌ More complex memory and session management |
|
❌ Cannot remember user preferences or progress without additional mechanisms | ❌ Can lead to performance issues if session data grows too large |
Understanding the core differences between stateful vs stateless backends is critical when building modern, scalable systems. In practice, most platforms blend both approaches depending on the specific requirements of each feature.
Redis serves as a powerful tool that supports both models, offering high-speed data access, durability, and flexibility.
Whether you are building a crypto exchange, a real-time gaming platform, or an e-commerce site, choosing the right architecture will shape your application’s performance and scalability for years to come.
Let your system architecture work with your goals, not against them.